‘Stones Live’ Alleged Cheating Scandal Rocks Poker World

A poker player and commentator from Stones Gambling Hall in Northern California accused certainly one of her fellow players of cheating during numerous live-streams in the poker show, “Stones Live.” Now the poker community has arrived together to bash the accused cheater.

Veronica Brill – aka “Angry Polak” – ended up being a commentator and poker that is regular on the “Stones Live” streams which features mostly low-stakes poker games. She publicly accused fellow player, Mike Postle, of cheating and has since been applauded by the poker community.

What is the Basis for the Cheating Allegations?

Mike Postle is a sacramento-area professional poker player that is local. By many records, he’s a player that is solid is far from world-class. But he somehow found a way to win at an absurdly rate that is high the “Stones Live” channels for more than per year.

Postle ended up beingn’t simply winning big. He had been regularly making the decisions that are correct tough spots. Brill had seen enough and accused Postle of cheating earlier this on Twitter.

The month poker community started investigating the problem by viewing a lot of time of “Stones real time” streams and deducted that Postle must be cheating.

Many top professionals such as for example Scott Seiver and Doug Polk viewed Postle earn some crazy performs and never destroyed a hand that is key. Popular poker podcaster Joe Ingram shared dozens of hours of Postle’s play on his YouTube channel.

Mike Postle Hires Attorney

Once Brill brought forth the accusations and the poker community began investigating, the pressure was on Postle to prove his innocence. Things got even worse for the poker pro when Mac VerStandig, an attorney for poker players, announced Brill and other victims had filed a $10 million lawsuit against Postle and Stones Gambling Hall.

To combat the suit that is civil Postle hired lawyer William J Portanova. Their lawyer quickly presented a defense that is potential.“I Guess he wins a complete lot of arms of poker. We don’t gamble, because that’s how hands that are many lose. But we don’t know what the known fact is. I will simply state this: once I perform poker We lose nearly every tactile hand, so I know such streaks are possible

,” Portanova said.

Portanova didn’t disclose the strategy that is specific intends to used to protect their customer. Nonetheless it’s clear he can try to persuade the jury that when a poker player can proceed through a losing that is long, they are also capable of going on lengthy winning streaks.

The reason for this defense is to show the jury that Postle was cheating that is n’t that he had been merely on a heater. It might seem hard to believe but that isn’t the point. The purpose of the argument is to put doubt in the jury’s mind so they’ll decline the lawsuit.

VerStandig and his team of accomplished lawyers, which includes talented poker pro Kelly Minkin, will have a difficult team proving Postle cheated without generating some evidence that is hard. At this time, all the proof focuses on Postle’s results that are overall questionable plays that paid off, and those are circumstantial.

Is There Any Hard Evidence Against Postle?

In civil court, it takes far less to prove the defendant responsible than in criminal court. But VerStandig and his team still might need some hard evidence to win the case and force Postle to pay back his alleged victims.it’s not going to be easy to prove in a court of law, at least not based on the evidence that has been presented at this point.


Despite it being clear to most poker pros that Postle cheated could need to prove his was utilizing devices that are physical see his opponent’s hole cards during “Stones Live” streams. If he’s unable to do that, winning the full instance against Postle won’t be simple, but it addittionally won’t be impossible.

If VerStandig can’t locate proof real proof, it does not indicate he won’t manage to show evidence that is hard the jury. It’s possible that one of Postle’s accomplices, if there are any, could fess up to the crime. But that could be a stretch someone that is expecting in the future ahead.

Postle Denies Allegations

Mike Postle ended up being recently interviewed on “The Mouthpiece” podcast, hosted by popular poker professional Mike Matusow. He denied cheating but didn’t actually show their purity.

He claims his winnings are exaggerated by the “Stones live crew that is order to make him seem almost like a poker god. But the streams are all available on YouTube in full and viewers can see that he was consistently winning big ever since 2018.(*)Postle july additionally denies constantly making decisions that are correct the river. He claims that there are plenty of videos that will show him being wrong when making a river decision. However, in the countless hours of play that Ingram shared on his YouTube channel, there are no examples that are such. Every move he made ended up being the play that is correct on what hand he held and his opponent’s cards.(*)The odds aren’t great that he wasn’t able to see his opponent’s cards during streams the year that is past. Nevertheless, maybe it’s hard for VerStandig to show in civil court. Nevertheless the poker community sure hopes the jury shall be convinced that Mike Postle ended up being cheating.(*)

Latest posts